Pages

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

Senators take on President Uhuru Kenyatta for endorsing cuts to county billions

 Angry Senators will ask the Supreme Court to nullify a new law signed by President Kenyatta that limits the revenue allocated to the counties to Sh210 billion.

They are unhappy that the President assented to the Division of Revenue Bill despite pleas that he should reject it.

The Supreme Court now braces for another controversial case just months after confirming Kenyatta as President and dismissing a presidential election petition filed by former Prime Minister Raila Odinga.

The Senate will likely ask the Supreme Court to declare the enactment of the Division of Revenue Act unconstitutional. The House, which had asked President Uhuru not to sign the Bill after he received it from the National Assembly, termed the move as having grave implications on the future of devolution.

The Senate suspended its business yesterday after word filtered out that the Head of State had assented to the Bill, and immediately retreated to a kamukunji (informal meeting) to deliberate the matter.

After the meeting, the senators came out with guns blazing and vowed to challenge the President’s move in the country’s highest court “if only to ensure that the constitutional stipulations are not violated”.

They said they would not relent in their duty to protect devolution and the county governments.

Senate Majority Leader Kithure Kindiki cited Article 96 (2) of the Constitution to justify their stand that the Senate has a role in allocation of national revenue to the counties.

It states: “The Senate participates in the law-making function of Parliament by considering, debating and approving Bills concerning counties, as provided in Articles 109 to 113.”  Kindiki said the Senate has eminent lawyers capable of prosecuting the matter.

He warned that President Kenyatta’s move could trigger violation of the Constitution in future, hence the Senate’s decision to approach the Supreme Court.

“Other bodies could also be willing to approach the court, but we do not want to be seen as acting through proxies,” said Kindiki.

No comments:

Post a Comment